Newham Council and LLDC consulted last month on some measures to improve some junctions in the Chobham Manor area.
The proposals are to
straighten out the zebra crossing from Honour Lea Avenue over Olympic Park Avenue into the Olympic Park, and add a parallel crossing to formally allow people to cycle across it with priority
add a mode filter at the junction with Temple Mills Lane and Abercrombie Road, only allowing buses and coaches
add speed cushions on Abercrombie Road and Olympic Park Avenue.
We were pleased to support these proposals, although we had reservations about the use of speed cushions which are not in line with best practice for cycle routes. We suggested the use of sinusoidal humps instead, and consultation with local stakeholders who use three-wheelers.
UPDATE: Thames Water in fact closed the Greenway on 11 September, before the diversion was made safe. For our statement on this matter and a full timeline of events please see our latest post.
There are two pieces of news to share about the partial closure of the Greenway/Cycleway 22 (previously reported here.)
Firstly: Thames Water have postponed the closure to start on 2nd September, to allow for additional work on the diversion route. This will include widening the ramp down to Manor Road and improving lighting, which is already in progress. It will still be steep, but this should make it a little more convenient to navigate and give plenty of space when passing pedestrians, wheelchair/pram users, and other cyclists.
Secondly: The currently-planned diversion will be via Canning Road, Abbey Road, Leywick Street, Richardson Road, Pond Road, and Manor Road. Longer-term Newham Council are looking at an additional diversion via the disused Crows Road bridge, but since this has been out of use for well over a decade it will take some time (and liaisons with multiple stakeholders) to bring it back into use for people walking and cycling. So the official diversion will be via Abbey Road, at least initially.
We are continuing to advocate for common-sense measures to make the diversion route suitable for all to use, and for these to be in place before the Manor Road bridge is closed. Jonathan and Karen, our Co-ordinator and Deputy Co-ordinator, met with Thames Water’s contractor, Barhale, at the end of July, and tested the route both on foot and by cycle. We found the following:
The shared pavement on Manor Road, while awkward, is workable, and with a temporary toucan crossing should be fine for people to cross.
The best route to join Abbey Road is via Pond Road, Richardson Road, and Leywick Street. This has the advantages of getting of Manor Road quickly, and passing in front of houses, a primary school, and some shopfronts—all of which lead to a better feeling of social safety than continuing on Manor Road. These streets are all effectively a low-traffic neighbourhood so were fine for cycling.
Abbey Road bridge is easily the most dangerous part of the diversion. Despite not being part of the strategic road network, and not carrying any bus routes (it can’t due to a very restrictive weight limit), Abbey Road was very heavily trafficked with drivers using it and Rick Roberts Way as a shortcut from Stratford High Street to Manor Road. We received a punishment pass when testing the route in one direction. The pavements are also too narrow for pedestrians, and obstructed by lamp posts. We also found that the sight lines from Canning Road onto Abbey Road were unacceptable, particularly given the speed that drivers approach from the west.
Our preferred solution here is a mode filter to prohibit all motor vehicles from the Abbey Road bridge for the duration of the works. Emergency vehicles would of course be exempt from this closure, and would likely benefit from reduced congestion on the bridge.
Our suggested interventions
We will continue to hold Thames Water and Newham Council to account in delivering a diversion route that works for all users of the Greenway, and protects this vital community asset for the thousands of people who rely on it each day.
We are pleased to report that Newham officers and politicians do appear to understand the importance of the Greenway to the public, and are making a good effort in delivering a diversion that works; we hope that Thames Water will be driven by them. In particular, our view is that if a workable diversion route is not ready by September 2nd, Thames Water should delay the start of their works again until a diversion can be delivered.
If you depend on the Greenway and want to help us hold Thames Water and Newham Council to account, then please do! You can help by joining the London Cycling Campaign, joining our newsgroup, and coming along to our meetings (the next will be at some time during September – details will be on the newsgroup.) The more people who campaign with us, the stronger our voice is.
UPDATE: Thames Water in fact closed the Greenway on 11 September, before the diversion was made safe. For our statement on this matter and a full timeline of events please see our latest post.
There is a plan to close The Greenway at Manor Road Bridge for 18 months from 19th August whilst Thames Water works are completed.
A diversion has been proposed, details of which are not yet finalised. Newham Cyclists have met with Thames Water and have provided feedback.
There will be a drop in (bus) session at Canning Road Bridge on 7th and 8th August 10am-6pm where you can raise your concerns.
Please pass this information to any other interested parties.
There will be Fix Your Ride stalls at Woodgrange School Summer Fete on 29 June, and at Forest Gate Festival on 6 July. The roster for 6 July is looking thin so if you are able to help that would be most welcome.
At some of our recent Fix Your Ride events, we have helped repair bikes which have been donated to refugees in our borough. These bikes typically require more attention than many others, and often more than we can offer at the Woodgrange Market stall. In some cases we have had to turn people away from the stall due to a lack of capacity. We discussed how to manage this situation, and have decided to explore some suggestions of how we can more effectively help refugees get their cycles roadworthy.
Infrastructure
Action in response to the 97 bus incident in Temple Mill Lane is ongoing.
There is a meeting arranged with the Romford Road Active Travel Scheme team. We reviewed progress to date and prospects for further progress.
We were pleased to attend a site visit of the in-progress Westfield Avenue scheme and meet with the engineers, project sponsors, and other stakeholders. This is a high quality scheme in which good progress is being made, and we are pleased to see efforts being made to retain safe pedestrian and cycle access throughout.
The Royal Docks corridor scheme, again high quality, is progressing.
We discussed the principles to be pursued at a forthcoming meeting with developers of a site on Stratford High Street. This is an excellent opportunity to influence in favour of active travel at an early stage of this project.
Outreach
We discussed outreach. There are 12 sign ups to the new discussion group; regular newsletters are being issued: we are rotating our meetings around the borough; we plan a QR code link to the sign up for the newsletter to extend its reach further; and discussed possible action at university Fresher’s Fairs in the area.
There was a General Election in the UK on Thursday 4th July 2024. We wrote to many of Newham’s candidates in the election, to ask them to support active travel if they’re elected.
Newham Cyclists, as part of the London Cycling Campaign, is politically neutral and independent. As part of a registered charity, we don’t (and legally can’t) tell you who to vote for. But we can report on candidates’ policies and allow you to make up your own mind.
Our Asks
We asked our MP candidates to:
recognise the importance of cycling, in addition to walking and wheeling, and support it to reach London’s 2030 Net Zero target; also to support London in bringing forward the Vision Zero target to 2030
help the Mayor and the London boroughs complete the Strategic Cycling Network by 2028, ahead of the 2041 target—for which there must be more transport funding, and more of it ring-fenced for cycling
advocate in Parliament to move national policy away from new roads to active travel—because it’s not prudent to throw £billions after schemes like the PFI-funded Silvertown Tunnel, and other cities and towns across the UK can learn from London’s cycling success story.
Read the entire text of our email to the candidates here.
We’re Newham Cyclists, part of the London Cycling Campaign. We are volunteers who campaign for safer cycling in Newham for everyone, and to break down barriers that stop people from cycling.
Thanks for standing to represent [your constituency] in the general election. We’re asking you to support our mission if you are elected, by:
Recognising the importance of cycling, along with walking and wheeling (“active travel”) and supporting it. Active travel projects will help London meet its target of Net Zero by 2030. Of course, not all car journeys in London can be cycled—but TfL analysis suggests lots of them can, if the conditions are made right.
We also want to see the Vision Zero target brought forward to 2030—saving lives by eliminating serious crashes on our streets. We want you to support TfL and the boroughs in rolling out innovative, proven-safe junction designs; and support the police in renewing focus on reducing harm in road transport.
Helping the Mayor and every London borough complete the Strategic Cycling Network by 2028, ahead of the current 2041 target date, to help all kinds of Londoners everywhere to access cycling. To deliver this, London needs more transport funding, and more of it ring-fenced for active travel.
Advocating in Parliament to shift national transport policy away from new roads to active travel schemes. It’s not prudent to throw £billions of public money after schemes that shave minutes off car journeys (such as the PFI-funded Silvertown Tunnel.) By contrast, active travel projects are cheap, have a good return on investment, and help bring communities together. Other towns and cities across Britain can learn from London’s cycling success story. We want you to work with the Mayor and other metro regions to secure a future where walking, cycling, and high-quality public transport are viable everywhere.
Finally, we remind you that despite noisy opposition to some of the Mayor of London’s policies on active travel and reducing unnecessary car use, he’s been re-elected with a large mandate. Cycling is very popular, and candidates that deliver for cycling get re-elected.
No-one wins, least of all drivers, when transport policy is driven by culture wars. Active travel is cheap and convenient, and we truly believe that everyone can benefit if it’s taken seriously. From kids going to school, to retirees meeting friends, to shift workers going shopping after a long day—we ask you to fight for policies that help more people access cycling for more journeys. A cycling Britain is a stronger Britain.
We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our asks.
The Candidates’ Responses
We emailed the candidates on the morning of Saturday 22 June, and updated this post as we received responses.
There were also a number of candidates for whom we were not able to find email addresses.
This page was last updated on Sun 7th July 2024 at 22:57, to add a (post-election) response from Sir Stephen Timms, and to indicate which candidates were elected. The candidates appear on the page in a random order.
Stratford and Bow
Party
Candidate
Response
Conservatives
Kane Blackwell
[unable to find email]
Labour
Uma Kumaran [elected]
[no response received]
Green
Joe Hudson-Small
“I agree completely with your aims, and with ending the culture war against active travel.
We’d invest 2.5bn in new cycleways and footpaths including London and we would adopt Active Travel England’s target for 2030. If elected I’ll push for all of these things.”
[The candidate also supplied a link to the Green Party manifesto.]
Workers Party
Halima Khan
[unable to find email]
Liberal Democrats
Janey Little
[unable to find email]
East Ham
Party
Candidate
Response
Liberal Democrats
Hillary Victoria Briffa
[unable to find email]
Conservatives
Maria Higson
[no response received]
Labour
Sir Stephen Timms [re-elected]
[received on Sunday 7th July, after the election] “I apologise for failing to respond on this. I found I just didn’t know enough about the specifics to judge whether bringing things forward to 2028 from 2041 made sense, and I also have not opposed the Silvertown Tunnel. I shall, however, be very happy to support the work of Newham Cyclists, and please do let me know if you feel I can help at any time.”
Green
Rosie Pearce
“I too am a local cyclist though not part of your organisation. I used to live in Groningen which shows a vision of how behaviour shifts can follow bold policy on cycling. You wouldn’t even take a taxi if you bought furniture there. Cycling in London is a bit scary often, and it varies a lot by borough. The green party is aiming for 50% of journeys within towns and cities to be walked or cycled by 2030. Investment in segregated cycle paths is a must, to achieve this, I think – most people won’t feel confident enough to cycle with current infrastructure and who can blame them!”
West Ham and Beckton
Party
Candidate
Response
Green
Rob Callender
“As a cyclist living in Newham, I fully support all this!”
TUSC
Lois Austin
[no response received]
Labour
James Asser [elected]
“As I am sure Newham Cyclists are aware I am a supporter of increasing active travel and giving people choice especially increasing opportunities to walk and cycle.
I hope my record as the Environment & Transport lead at Newham Council speaks to my commitment to deliver on that belief. I am very proud of the work we achieved and hope if elected I can support my successors in the continuing work.
I hope too that the work started during my time jn [sic] office on making our roads safer speaks for itself.
Tackling air pollution and dealing with climate change are going to be key issues in the years ahead and I am keen to play my part in driving forward the changes we need to make.”
Conservatives
Holly Ramsey
[no response received]
Newham Independents
Sophia Naqvi
[unable to find email]
Liberal Democrats
Emily Bigland
[no response received]
Where’s my candidate?
As volunteers who juggle campaigning with our other commitments (full time jobs, families, etc.) we simply did not have the time or capacity to approach every single candidate for MP—particularly where their contact details were not publicly available.
We sourced email addresses for the candidates on https://whocanivotefor.co.uk but only emailed addresses that were clearly candidate-specific, rather than general party inboxes. Candidates who were not listed here were welcome to approach us by email to respond to our asks.
We are within our rights not to seek a view from minor or “fringe” parties which advocate for policies not in line with Newham Cyclists’ or LCC’s terms of reference, objectives, and values. For instance, we would decline to engage with candidates or parties that espouse views that are clearly racist, or peddle conspiracy theories.
The meeting took place at the Olympic Park, post Freecycle ride.
Upcoming events and support required
8/6 Fix your Ride – people allocated. 29/6 school fete – do we have sufficient support for this? Forest Gate Festival 6th July – people allocated – need to check if there is room for outreach (KF)
Planning meeting in November – items to complete
SOP for our group – to provide visibility of roles and to allow others to take on roles.
Ride calendar (in parallel with FYR and AAA dates if possible, to avoid calendar clashes). Ideally a range of people will lead a range of rides. We can ask people if they have a ride they would like to lead, or offer them rides which require leading. We will ask LCC for ride leader and Marshall training/youth opps /safeguarding training at the local groups meeting. Possible new rides – Cambridge – with Dunwich dynamo to Morton then back from Epping.
What is the best way to share documents? Find out if everyone can edit a google spreadsheet (JR)
Marketing
Bike flags we ordered – where are they? NC tabards – numbers and prices?Stickers?
Bicycle agony aunt – via the newsletter?
Cyclists breakfast – Greenway? Timing for this?
Infrastructure
The new Infrastructure group requires a separate mailing list – Chris Kershaw to organise.
Romford Road scheme – are the old bustops being taken away?
Salway Place – is this restricted now?
Temple Mill Lane – 97 bus bridge incident – approach:
letter to bus garage – who?
Approach TfL buses – Simon has a regular meeting with TFL buses, can we use this?
A pleasing and convivial turnout at Canning Town Library, a new venue for us.
We were entertained by Shameem and Nasim from Cycle Sisters, an award-winning charity which inspires and enables Muslim women to cycle, who gave an inspirational talk on their cycling journey.
We elected the following officers:
·Co-ordinator: Jonathan Rothwell
·Treasurer: Bill Bremner
·Secretary: vacant (role to be fulfilled by Co-ordinator and others on the committee)
·Olympic Park rep: vacant, potentially to merge into new infrastructure working group
·Community Infrastructure (Fund) rep:vacant, potentially to merge into new infrastructure working group
·Deputy Treasurer: vacant.
We approved the annual accounts for 2023 – 24 and the budget for 2024 -25 presented by the Treasurer.
We noted the Annual report for 2023 -24.
Our business included lively conversation local cycling issues, including the need to leverage benefits for active travel from the plethora of major developments in the pipeline, progress on the Romford Road Active Travel Scheme, improving our outreach across the whole of Newham, extending our partnerships, and a variety of forthcoming events – the Newham Green Fair, rides based on Lea Valley Nature Reserves and Essex Country Lanes, our participation in the London Freecycle and support for the children’s cycling club at Ambition, Aspire, Achieve.
